i think we should develop an unofficial standard for reviews (even though i know its impossible to stop spam reviews) so people know what artists want to know
i think ellebirdy23's reviewing method is helpful and informative so as ignored as this post might be here we go:
Here's the review card:
Instrument Blend--- 0/2
Accuracy--------------- 0 - 0.5/1
Clear Concept ------- 0 - 0.5/1
Originality------------- 0/3
Appeal----------------- 0/3
(ROUNDED UP)
Total------------------- 0/10
Instrument Blend:
This Section here would be to explain to the artist if the sounds used in the song mix well together and to make sure they do not sound out of place and/or random.
Accuracy:
this section should review how the overall sound of the song is created whether it be an original song or a remix of something. this section can be used to judge how "on key" the notes are with each other or if the tempo is handled well and all the instruments/percussion are well meshed together.
Clear Concept:
This Section would cover whether the song that you are reviewing was created for the reason it might have been created for, for example if someone made a song called "stroll through the woods" and the song just didn't seem to fit the description then it would affect your review accordingly. (not as important as other sections becasue some songs may have titles that might not be relevant but that would not mean the song could not be good)
Originality:
This Section would pertain to how "fresh" a song is or might be, if it just didn't seem all to original then your review would be affected accordingly (this would be one of the more important sections)
Appeal:
This Section would be about how the song affected you and would have personal opinions (and maybe even controlled bias's ) did it appeal to you? or is it just another song on newgrounds (an outlet to support personal opinions without bashing/destroying the artists in the process)
tell me what you think, and thank ellebirdy23 for using this helpful reviewing system